> well thats typical icann - jobs for the boys. If that can be interpreted as "making the decision for .ORG that will treat non-profit clients most appropriately and the non-profit provider with the most preference," it sounds like a great idea to me.
- Re: .ORG Issues Dave Warren
- Re: .ORG Issues Joe Baptista
- Re: .ORG Issues Dave Warren
- Re: .ORG Issues Fearghas McKay
- RE: .ORG Issues Roger B.A. Klorese
- RE: .ORG Issues Fearghas McKay
- RE: .ORG Issues Roger B.A. Klorese
- RE: .ORG Issues Fearghas McKay
- RE: .ORG Issues Roger B.A. Klorese
- RE: .ORG Issues Joe Baptista
- RE: .ORG Issues Roger B.A. Klorese
- RE: .ORG Issues Joe Baptista
- Re: .ORG Issues Swerve
- Re: .ORG Issues Joe Baptista
- Re: .ORG Issues Marc Storck
- Re: .ORG Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: .ORG Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: .ORG Issues bill
- Re: .ORG Issues bill
