Michael, Harsh and way off mark. PIR is pretty responsive to issues which are actually brought forward to them. Their court docket is pretty light compared to some other registries :-S
Play nice now ;) James On 7/2/04 6:18 PM, "Michael Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PIR.org have risen to their level of incompetence. It is a laughing > stock with companies such as cisco, etc. From what I hear, no one > really has a relationship with them, just court appearances. > > Jeff Wasilko wrote: > >> .org was dead from large parts of the net yesterday for more than >> 2 hours: >> >> http://www.cymru.com/DNS/gtlddns-o.html >> >> This is at least the 2nd time this has happened (last time I have >> recorded is 10/16/2003). >> >> The outages on both occasions have been side-effects of the fancy >> anycast announcements that UltraDNS use for .org. They only >> include 2 hostnames in the NS records for .org: >> >> ;; ANSWER SECTION: >> org. 86400 IN NS TLD1.ULTRADNS.NET. >> org. 86400 IN NS TLD2.ULTRADNS.NET. >> >> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: >> TLD1.ULTRADNS.NET. 166716 IN A 204.74.112.1 >> TLD2.ULTRADNS.NET. 74600 IN A 204.74.113.1 >> >> >> Is there someone within Tucows/OpenSRS that has a relationship with PIR >> and could help bring this to their attention? .org shouldn't be less >> reliable than .com/.net, but since PIR.org took it over it has been MUCH >> less reliable. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -j >> >> >>
