On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:28:33PM -0400, James M Woods wrote: > Michael, > > Harsh and way off mark. PIR is pretty responsive to issues which are > actually brought forward to them. Their court docket is pretty light > compared to some other registries :-S
Yeah, I agree. This problem isn't directly caused by PIR, and hopefully they can get the folks that can fix it (UltraDNS) to do something. -j
