Correct me if I am wrong, but companies like the eu registry of EU and America, sended a letter that costumer has to sign... So basicly they give their written approval. On the other side, that were not sure what they were doing, but that doesnt affect the metter that they did it (signed it)...
Yet again, i'm not sure how would ICANN / court / whoever deciding go around this?! Regards, Skodric KPN Holland > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 28/07/2004 4:19 PM Gordon Hudson noted that; > > | You and I, Neil, are in the wrong business. > | There is much easier money to be made in this sort of thing and there > are no > | consequences for those who do it. > > Effective Nov. 12 we will be able to pursue remedial action for > inappropriate gTLD transfers via ICANN sanctioned processes for each > incident in which the registrant did not appropriately approve the > transfer. This will cost the gaining registrar for each complaint in > which they are found not to have obtained the requisite approvals or > followed the prescribed processes. > > Registrars that do business with firms like this will either have to > clean up or face significant financial penalties. > - -- > > > > > ~ -rwr > > > > > > > > > ~ "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument, > ~ every utensil, every article designed for use, of each > ~ and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings." > ~ - Robert Collier > > > Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com > My Blogware: http://www.byte.org > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP) > > iD8DBQFBCBA26sL06XjirooRAoWtAJwJxYBVzgTxu54Ja9OhTqK2XDZFYQCdEU2w > b6NaGgEHS8Eo5+3ACe7UGzw= > =x0vO > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > With best regards, Aleksandar Skodric
