It was NAT that extended the life of IPV4. In any case, it will be an interesting next couple of years in IP space.
On 02/14/2011 04:50 PM, Rob Hasselbaum wrote: > I did a senior project on IPv6 as an undergrad. That was 1997. I > remember noting in my presentation that IPv6 adoption was just around > the corner. Ah, the innocence of youth. > > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Jerry Feldman <g...@blu.org > <mailto:g...@blu.org>> wrote: > > It has been a while since we have had an IPV6 speaker. Back in > 1999 (or > 1998) we had a guy who was developing IPV6. > > On 02/14/2011 03:00 PM, Chris O'Connell wrote: > > an interesting idea for a presentation: Linux and IPv6! > > > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Jerry Feldman <g...@blu.org > <mailto:g...@blu.org> > > <mailto:g...@blu.org <mailto:g...@blu.org>>> wrote: > > > > I was just reading the following article in the NYTimes: > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/15/technology/15internet.html?partner=rss&emc=rss > > <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/15/technology/15internet.html?partner=rss&emc=rss> > > > > <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/15/technology/15internet.html?partner=rss&emc=rss > > <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/15/technology/15internet.html?partner=rss&emc=rss>> > > > > > > By LAURIE J. FLYNN > > > > > > Published: February 14, 2011 > > > > Who could have guessed that 4.3 billion Internet connections > > wouldn’t be > > enough? > > > > Certainly not Vint Cerf. > > > > The next few years could get interesting. > > > -- Jerry Feldman <g...@blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
