> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Edward Ned Harvey > > So moving forward, it seems only natural that (for people who agree > with this policy) a lot of IPv6 firewalls will need to be configured to > block all inbound IPv6 traffic and permit all outbound. Unfortunately, this > defeats the main value-add of IPv6, which is peer-to-peer. > > So logically, it seems natural, a lot of IPv6 firewalls will need to support > things like NAT-PMP, or IGD, so the internal devices can automatically
First of all, I could name some legitimate uses for NAT even in IPv6, so what's with the religious anti-nat sentiment. Relax everyone. Second of all, the question I asked has no relation to NAT. Does anyone want to re-read the OP and reply about the firewall rules and allowing of inbound traffic on IPv6? _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
