Edward Ned Harvey <[email protected]> writes:
> Second of all, the question I asked has no relation to NAT. Does anyone
> want to re-read the OP and reply about the firewall rules and allowing of
> inbound traffic on IPv6?
I am aware of no such protocol effort in v6.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-09
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-16
Per the latter:
To avoid the need for IPv6 applications to use techniques like STUN
for opening and maintaining dynamic filter state, something similar
to NAT-PMP and UPnP-IGD but without actually supporting NAT could
be deployed. Alas, no consensus has yet emerged in the Internet
engineering community as to what is most appropriate for
residential IPv6 usage scenarios.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
