On 04/26/2011 10:01 AM, Richard Pieri wrote: > On Apr 26, 2011, at 1:15 AM, David Kramer wrote: >> Having a configuration setting in an advanced tab somewhere to turn on >> showing the names/icons/both in app links does NOT make anything harder >> for the beginners, and enables the power user. This is just one thing >> that should be configurable of many, so please take this statement as >> addressing the larger "design pattern" of making things simpler by >> removing functionality instead of reorganizing functionality. The same >> goes for only running one instance of any app, only one dock bar, >> automaximizing windows that happen to touch the edge of the screen, ... >> Yes, Rhythmbox. Like I said in my last post, it crashes when working >> with my iPod and I filed a bug report and cooperated with them every >> step and they say they're not fixing it. The short summary of the >> problem is it can't handle a collection with metadata over a certain >> physical size because they got cheap on field sizes. I have a 120GB >> Classic with about 6800 songs on it, and it worked fine. Then I started >> adding album art, and before you know it I was over the limit. They >> understand and acknowledge it, but won't fix it. > These two paragraphs are a good capsule summary of why I dislike the GNOME > Desktop and have since version 2 was released. Moving customization options > to an advanced settings tab or pane is good. Taking those options away > entirely is bad, yet that was the touted "improvement" going from GNOME 1 to > GNOME 2: everything is simpler. No, not simpler. Dumbed down. Not the same > thing. From the sound of it, GNOME 2 to GNOME 3 is even more dumbing down. > I'm not trying to be an Apple fanboy here, but look at Apple's UIs and UI > guidelines. That is simple. That is consistent (except when Apple breaks > its own rules). Taking functionality away is not an improvement. > > The second... how long have users been reporting and providing patches for > the Metacity window sizing and placement problems that have been with GNOME 2 > since before Day 1? And despite this have any of these fixes been rolled > into the mainline code? No. Based on their actions -- more notably > inactions -- I think that that the GNOME developers simply don't care about > users. > I think your last sentence might hit the nail on the head. But, I think we, in the Linux community, have some interesting issues. First, our new users have traditionally come from the Windows environment, so we get questions like the one I saw yesterday, "When installing Windows it asks you where to put the program, such as C:/Program Files". But, on the other side we have long-term power users who prefer the command line, and for system configuration prefer to edit text files. So, we generally have a very wide range of users, from the technically challenged to the experienced developers. We are also used to being able to customize our environments much more than Windows. Another more recent issue is the tablet computers, such as iPad and Android.
I moved to Gnome partially because I generally work with RHEL systems, but also because I did not like the direction KDE was going. -- Jerry Feldman <[email protected]> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
