>> From: [email protected] [mailto:discuss- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of >> >> I have not been able to find a good alternative. ZFS is stalled with >> license issues and Btrfs is not stable. > > What application are you intending to use it for? Does it need to be > linux?
Well, not technically, but from a cost/benefit sort of analysis, I don't know of a better platform. > In many situations, even if you're using linux, it might be ok to run > either > user-mode ZFS or ZFS on a separate system connected via NFS or ISCSI or > whatever. Still concerned over support and Oracle. When that is ironed out, I'll be able to reconsider it. > > Saying btrfs is unstable ... It's a matter of perspective, and I'll > disagree. I would say it's lacking some important features still, but > would > not call it unstable. Please note, I did not call it "unstable," I said it was not "stable." The difference is subtle, but important. The Btrfs branch is not considered "stable" yet. > > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
