On 01/30/2012 07:59 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > For an administrator who hasn't admin'd wikis before (as evidenced by the > fact you're considering twiki, which is horrible and relatively > unmaintained, largely because it's written in perl) ... You want one that > doesn't require all massively difficult hoops to jump through, as most wikis > do, in order to install, maintain, add plugins etc.
While perl is hardly my first choice of language, that has more to do with people than software. Foswiki is very actively maintained. And it has a unit test suite to keep it from breaking. It also has a plugin manager so you don't need to search for plugins and install them from the command line. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
