On 3/10/2015 1:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
intensive for much hungrier applications. LVM is much more light weight and has better performance in applications that manage their own journalling and data integrity (like a database).
If you're getting substantially better performance with LVM than with ZFS then you've done something wrong. ZFS done right is only a little worse than bare disk speeds assuming that you have enough physical RAM for I/O cache (or dedicated ZIL and L2ARC vdevs for heavy I/O loads) and enough CPU for raidz, compression and encryption if you are using these features.
-- Rich P. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
