> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > >> From: Discuss [mailto:[email protected]] On > >> Behalf Of [email protected] > >> > >> says give ZFS whole disks, which is stupid. > > > > Mark, clearly you know nothing about ZFS. > > Think what you wish. Maybe I'm not explaining the problem....
You're explaining your thoughts well - it's just that you're saying a lot of things that demonstrate lack of understanding of ZFS. Normally I like to react to those kind of things in a helpful manner, but for 1, you're certainly writing the stuff much faster than I have time to react to, and for 2, based on a zillion similar things you've written here before, I believe you have some kind of personal bias that I don't understand, some kind of personal resentment for zfs. I don't think anything I can say is going to change your mind about anything, so it would also be a waste of time for me to react to your zfs comments for your sake. I personally believe each tool is a tool, and has characteristics different from each other, and based on those characteristic differences, each tool is better for certain situations. But as I mentioned, there's *almost* no situation I can think of where I would choose lvm over zfs. I only want to tell people "don't listen to what this guy says about zfs. If you want to know, start a different conversation about it." But if you want to know how to make lvm do something - ask Mark. He loves it, and uses it more extensively than anyone I know. Just don't listen to his comparisons of lvm and zfs, because they are largely inaccurate and unfairly biased. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
