On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:12:06 -0500, Rich Pieri wrote: > On 2/19/2016 2:27 PM, Robert Krawitz wrote: >> True for RMS; not so true for Linus (he delegates a lot but still >> retains final control). But if they really are that irrelevant, why >> does it matter what they say? > > Because what they say is cruel and uncalled-for.
But if they're that irrelevant, what difference does it make? > Back at you: how does forking the code get them to stop being cruel? Again: if they're rendered completely irrelevant, why does it matter if their words are cruel and uncalled-for? -- Robert Krawitz <[email protected]> *** MIT Engineers A Proud Tradition http://mitathletics.com *** Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- http://ProgFree.org Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
