On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 08:22:01PM -0500, IngeGNUe wrote: > Either they're irrelevant or they aren't? In my view they are > irrelevant. Like how I feel about celebrities -- it's a decision you > make. And perhaps if that perspective becomes contagious, then it will > be solved. There's plenty of other people working toward the same goals. > But it won't be solved by continuing to give them attention, right?
This is the right insight, I think. Even if they are, for all practical intents and purposes, completely irrelevant, they never really will be entirely, because of the celebrity factor. What they say will carry weight, even if they are not involved. But that's exactly why they should not be asses--it doesn't just make them look bad, it makes everyone involved look bad by association. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
