On 4/2/2016 10:20 PM, Matthew Gillen wrote: > That would satisfy the anti-tivoization and be within the limits of the > GPLv3, while still causing a problem for the FBI in this particular > instance.
Incorrect on both counts. Part 6 prohibits restrictions on consumer devices that prevent or interfere with the continued operation of modified software. Automatically wiping or factory resetting the device definitely constitutes interference. Part 3 requires that circumvention of DRM around covered works be permitted. Even if you could find a way around the terms of Part 6 you could not prevent a user from circumventing your auto-wipe DRM. -- Rich P. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
