>Philipp, > >> hi, >> >> thank you for clarification. >> >> i just wanted to test storage based fencing. >> May i have to reconsider about using storage based fencing, but since my >> actual fencing method(fence_cisco_ucs) use ip, i'm not 100% sure if this >> is enough to keep my VMs safe. > >So you are running multiple VMs (and on them cluster) or cluster of bare >metal machines with VMs (and they are not part of cluster)? > Hi,
yes, 2 baremetal nodes with pacemaker, running several VMs. >Because for first case, it's best to use VMs fencing. For second case, >fence_cisco_ucs is probably best method, because it will simply prohibit >evinced node to access shared storage with VMs, so VMs are safe. > So fence_cisco_ucs should be enough, no storage based fencing needed? > >Regards, > Honza > >> >> i will file a bug for sbd >> >> regards >> >>
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
