On 2010-10-01 3:12 PM, Jon Hamkins wrote:
> The statement from Oracle implies they are keeping the trademark, so I
> think we are beyond hope on that point -- they are wishing us farewell
> and good luck on our fork, not rejoining us.
> 
> There is one helpful thing about their comment, which is that it came
> quickly and we can now all settle on LibreOffice as the longterm name --
> it will be an actual fork, not a temporary name that may revert back to
> OpenOffice.org.

One thing I would like to see the Document Foundation undertake is to
(or at least try to) organize the other major efforts, like Go-oo,
OxygenOffice and NeoOffice - and maybe now even IBM/Lotus Symphony - to
eliminate duplication of effort and coordinate patch acceptance, etc.

The inclusion of most of go-oo's more stable patches in the first beta
release is an excellent first step in this direction, and I hope is only
'shades of things to come' in this area.

I'm getting really excited at the possibilities!

-- 

Best regards,

Charles
-- 
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to 
[email protected]
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Reply via email to