Hi Marc, all,
Marc Paré wrote:
> Le 2010-10-01 16:52, Charles Marcus a écrit :
>> On 2010-10-01 3:12 PM, Jon Hamkins wrote:
>>> The statement from Oracle implies they are keeping the trademark, so I
>>> think we are beyond hope on that point -- they are wishing us farewell
>>> and good luck on our fork, not rejoining us.
>>>
>>> There is one helpful thing about their comment, which is that it came
>>> quickly and we can now all settle on LibreOffice as the longterm
name --
>>> it will be an actual fork, not a temporary name that may revert back to
>>> OpenOffice.org.
>> One thing I would like to see the Document Foundation undertake is to
>> (or at least try to) organize the other major efforts, like Go-oo,
>> OxygenOffice and NeoOffice - and maybe now even IBM/Lotus Symphony - to
>> eliminate duplication of effort and coordinate patch acceptance, etc.
>>
>> The inclusion of most of go-oo's more stable patches in the first beta
>> release is an excellent first step in this direction, and I hope is only
>> 'shades of things to come' in this area.
>>
>> I'm getting really excited at the possibilities!
>>
> I don't know if I missed this or not, maybe Sophie could answer this,
but, have Go-oo, OxygenOffice, NeoOffice and Symphony express any
interest in joining forces with LibreOffice. I also agree that it would
be nice if we could all eliminated the duplication.
Actually only Symphony didn't join yet, the other guys are there.
Kind regards
Sophie
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to
discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
