On Mon, 2010-10-04, Graham Lauder <[email protected]> wrote: > Document Foundation is obviously cast in stone because that is a legal entity > but the product name should be up for discussion right now when it's most > sensible.
Being pedantic here, according to Sophie in a note on a thread titled '[Legalese] "Foundation" or "Group"?' on Oct 1, the Document Foundation is not in fact a legal entity yet. (I was surprised to read this.) > Currently it's a group and the Foundation is not up yet, we will set > it up with the community members who wish to contribute to it. We are > planing to write a charter, organization, governance, duties, etc... > not only the small group who has launched the project, but all of the > people who are willing to be part of the Foundation. > [...] > For the moment, the German association is helping us to structure the > whole thing and have a legal backup, but we still have a lot of work > to move to an official foundation. --Jean -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to [email protected] All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
