On 10/06/2010 11:39 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
> Le 2010-10-06 14:30, Steven Shelton a écrit :
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 10/6/2010 2:21 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>> Oh - and one thing that I'd really like to see is a simple 'incremental
>>> updater' that just downloads a 'patch' file and patches itself, like
>>> Firefox and Thunderbird and lots of other programs do now
> I would vote for this too. It would be amazing if it were capable.
This functionality is already available in package managers, if we just
take care to use it. yum, for example, supports delta RPMs. The way
this works is LibO would publish delta RPMs that contain all the
differences from the previous release, and then the users yum package
manager would download the delta RPM, build the full RPM from it, and
install. This approach has been in use for about a year and a half by
fedora. I'm not sure about apt-get systems -- they probably have
something similar. It really saves on bandwidth.
----Jon
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to
[email protected]
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
