Hi Nguyen, all
would you mind continuing this discussion on the forwarded thread on the
website list (webs...@libreofffice.org)?
I just replied there:
http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/msg00039.html
It's not easy to keep two threads on the same topic in view.
Be
Nguyen Vu Hung schrieb:
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Jean Hollis Weber<jeanwe...@gmail.com>wrot
e:
I agree with Florian that hiding addresses doesn't help much, and the
disadvantages are greater (for me). I vote to leave the lists as they
are. But we do need to add to the warning on the signup page.
This is an example on how to hide emails from the bots.
http://lists.tlug.jp/ML/0711/msg00001.html
-> # From: "Nguyen Vu Hung"<vuhung16p...@example.com>
but in the mail itself it reads:
"Wayne <beerisl...@example.com>:"
what seems quite easy to read for a bot I assume.
Providing dead links doesn't serve anything - it could be replaced by
clear text, as not everybody will think about checking the mail address
when replying.
I think Florian, Jean and others will be able to copy/paste the mail
address from the archive instead just clicking on the link, but this
doesn't prevent any crawler from harvesting IMHO.
If it's possible, revealing the mail addresses only if you are
subscribed to the website might be a better approach - provided that
there is no other archive showing the mail addresses directly...
Best regards
Bernhard
PS: setting reply-to to webs...@libo - please remove the reply-to to
this list, if this doesn't work
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
