I would suggest that LibreOffice would work fine for International English. I guarantee that more people who don't already understand both and 'gratis' will understand (or not) 'Libre' just as well as 'gratis'.
Perhaps 'Liberty Office' or 'Office Freedom'. (I make no claim to these names and don't know if they're previously copyrighted, copylefted or under any sort of license) Regards, Eric On Oct 13, 2010, at 3:24 AM, "Paul A Norman" <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you Stefan, > > I'm not hooked on any partiacular name just two main principlpes. > > 1) That the International English name be easy on the tongue for > English speakers > and with that, that thought be given to language group names in the same way > > 2) The name mean something for the users (more than for the developers > if necessary) > > Incorporating in the name principles of philosophy of development - - > or project administration, will unfrotunately not be of apparent > importance or help to potential general new users. > > Names that 'sell the product' or 'introduce the product' from a user's > perspective would be very helpful in helping increase the uptake of > the office suite amongst as yet unreached people. > > Paul > > > > On 13 October 2010 21:57, Stefan Weigel <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Paul A Norman schrieb: >> >>> Romance Languages: LibreOffice >>> >>> International English: FreeOffice >> >> Don´t use "free"! This would cause misunderstanding: >> >> FreeOffice --> free office --> gratis office >> >> The product is not (only / necessarily) free of charge ("freeware"). It´s >> free in sense of liberty. >> >> Stefan >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail to [email protected] >> All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be >> deleted. >> List archives are available at >> http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ >> >> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail to [email protected] > All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted. > List archives are available at > http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ > N�����r��y隊[hv+ ��>��iv�.���~��u�b�z+� e��,j�ʋ�zwm��b�X��������br\���b��Z���z-m�^��^t����܆+ޱ��j��y�a��� 0v�.���~��u�b�z+��b��?v+ ��?
