On 2010-10-22 11:38 AM, Barbara Duprey wrote: > OK, then I'm back to my initial position -- since informative responses > can easily come deeper in the thread, this technique (even if it were > supported by the list manager capabilities) would lead to such responses > failing to reach the OP without additional action by the responder. > However, if the OP is given information about use of nabble, say (either > by the moderator supplying general instructions, or a list member > supplying a specific link to the thread), then the OP has access to > *all* responses and no cc'ing would ever be required. This possibility > is supported even with no changes made through the list manager.
Hmmm.. Ok, another idea... Just send an auto-reply to the unsubbed OP when they post anything, with a direct link to the Nabble thread, and inform the user that they will need to get their answers from there - although they'd have to actually visit the link to know if there were any more answers... Anyway, it looks like I'm fighting a losing battle... and honestly, if the moderators don't mind all of the work, who am I to complain? I can easily just circular file the noise the situation generates... I think the best way to resolve this completely would be a Forum-Mailist gateway, where the unsubbed OP is automatically subscribed to the companion forum thread and will receive email updates whenever someone replies (via email or the forum)... -- Best regards, Charles -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
