On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 11:57 +0100, Gianluca Turconi wrote: > Il 04/11/2010 16.56, Italo Vignoli ha scritto: > > The community cannot issue formal certifications about software, and > > this is where the OOo project has missed the point. > > I know it. > > Nevertheless, a foundation isn't needed to start a certification program. > > Any vendor may start it, with more or less official and international > character. > > And, by saying the truth, why a TDF certification program should be > better than a hypothetical "IBM LIbO certified professional" label, in a > wider Community?
Certification is based on confidence. Large vendors putting their name on certification helps in that process. However, there are other considerations. Here in the UK, unless training leads to a government accredited certification it won't get funded. That means in practice no FE College is going to offer that certification and you are confining your market to the private sector. In addition, in Europe it is a high priority for National Qualifications frameworks and their associated qualifications to be referenced to the European Qualifications Framework. This can attract funding from the EU into the project and give further confidence in the certification. So what I said to the OOo community about 6 years ago was that certification provided an opportunity to get an income for development that was independent of Sun. I guess I explained it badly :-) Sure anyone could make a certification program - *If* they have the professional knowledge and will to make it work. Its not as simple as just printing certificates ;-) But if there is a desire for an independent LO foundation it also provides an opportunity to sustain it. > I'm surely missing something, but *as far as what I've read in this list > is concerned*, this foundation is starting to appear like an empty box: > few needs to exist and even less powers. > > Please, get me right, I'm really trying to understand, because I've read > several different opinions from TDF founders and I know a consensus has > still to be found about this matter. However, the vehemence of some > voices let me think that a majority may already exist in your group, > although there hasn't been a vote yet. > > Or, at least, that any decision different from the opinion expressed, > for example, by Michael Meeks, may cause more problems than anything > else during the foundation start-up phase, independently of the fair > evaluation of the alternatives. > > Regards, > -- > Gianluca Turconi -- Ian Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications A new approach to assessment for learning www.theINGOTs.org - 01827 305940 You have received this email from the following company: The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales. -- Unsubscribe instructions: Email to [email protected] Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
