Hello, Le Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:08:30 +0000, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> a écrit :
> Hi there, > > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 21:03 +0800, David Nelson wrote: > > It seems that there are still some big ambiguities that would need > > to be resolved: > > Well detected :-) > > > "The Chairperson is elected by a special electoral college comprised > > of the BoD, the AB and and the ESC (however, ESC members who are > > also members of the BoD can only cast one single vote in this > > election, > > Oh - wow, what is the ESC doing in that mix. I would prefer > that the board simply elect the chairman, who is just a member of the > board that has some special meeting management role :-) > > Hopefully that de-complicates the whole process; then again I > havn't read the proposal in full recently. > > I believe there is a -huge- danger of over-engineering any > constitution > - particularly when you get engineers near it :-) and ending up with > some huge joke like the OO.o governance - where obscure rules seemed > to breed in dark corners :-) So, I'm going to rewrite the ESC part; it will at least simplify the chairman story. But having him/her part of the BoD would also nix its role I fear. Best, Charles. > > HTH, > > Michael. -- Charles-H. Schulz Membre du Comité exécutif The Document Foundation. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
