Il 18/12/2010 14:21, MiguelAngel ha scritto:
What is critical and impossible?
The associations are with a executable file in a specific path.
No problem for two files with same name in different paths.
No problem to change the association to an executable file with the same
name in a different path.
Libo 3.3rc1 and OOo 3.3rc8 on same disk, also OOo 3.2.1 in a portable
mode (3.2.1 over 3.2.0 portable)
On 18/12/10 2:09, NoOp wrote:
On 12/17/2010 05:53 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
As many others already commented, I believe it's time that LibreOffice
changes the names of some of the individual applications, my humble
proposal:
Write
Spread
I think "Calc" is better than "Spread" because point out the application
main purpose that is to execute many *calcs* rather than being mainly
(a) "spread" (sheet), isn't it?
However I think for 3.3 it is better to maintain the OOo names and then
(3.4, 4.0, ...) rethinking icons, names and so on.
Carlo
Present
Draw
Formula
Base
This is critical when attempting to have OOo and LibO co-exist on Windows.
- LO takes over all OOo application defaults& icons.
- LO uses the same executable names as OOo (soffice.exe, swriter.exe,
etc). This makes it impossible to select an .odt and re-associate it
with OOo.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
