Hi Jeremy and others,
...
"Johannes A. Bodwing"<jo...@arcor.de> wrote:
If we change names, we should do it on the background of the real
functions of a modern Office-Suite. For that eventually we have to
think deeply about a complete new naming-background for the future LO.
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 19:24:06 +0100
RGB ES<rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe for 4.0... but must be planned with great precision and the old
version must be supported for some time too.
+1
Names for the moduls of LO are not yet the thing. Like some others
already said:
First their is the final release of LO 3.3 (in januaray 2011 I think).
In my opinion after this release we have to clear the goals of TDF and
LO and what kind of Office-Suite LO should be in or for the future.
Eventually even what other kind of software TDF will make.
After that we have a better basis to discuss or not about the best names
for LO-modules.
That doesn't mean that we fall silent. Everyone can collect his/her
ideas till the release of LO 3.3, and then - kick off for the best open
Office Suite ever.
This leads me to the question: Who from TDF/LO has the overview of the
most effiency schedule for major steps of the TDF/LO-project?
Is there someone who says what has to come next to build the project in
its best way with the personal it has at the moment?
And could it be helpful to have such a schedule on the webiste of TDF
and all national groups, with a rough timetable and permanently refreshed?
Johannes
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***