On 01/01/11 17:07, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote:
> Why does Thunderbird, which ships with
> American English need an extension before it can use a British English
> dictionary? Why
> can Thunderbird not share a dictionary with LibO. What about Scribus? MSO
> users are
> used to a shared dictionary across apps.
I *think* Mozilla Thunderbird uses hunspell now, so surely it should be
possible to share dictionaries with OOo/LibO.
I wonder whether it would be appropriate to launch a new project, under
the auspices of The Document Foundation, concerned with language. It
could co-ordinate collaboration efforts between organisations like
dicollect, wiktionary and alike to produce standardised spelling and
grammar dictionaries and thesauruses for use by other projects (that use
hunspell). The reason why I suggest a separate project is that, outside
of product integration efforts, the standardisation of language requires
(I assume) very different skill-sets to those required for coding, and
organisations like dicollect and wiktionary are probably best placed to
take the lead in that arena.
Also, I agree with everything Zaphod said.
Kind Regards,
Lee Hyde.
--
"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel"
-- Dr. Samuel Johnson (April 7th, 1775)
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
