Le 24/02/11 16:51, Phil Hibbs a écrit : Hi Phil,
> > Nonetheless, saying "it's better for us if you don't submit your > patches to OOo" is kind of like saying "Lets hope OOo don't spot this > bug/issue". It's ethically dubious. If this is the official approach, > then why not just make a clean break with OOo and not even try to > merge in any future OOo code changes with the LO code? At a wild guess, because there are not enough devs in the LibO project to fix all the bugs in the current OOo code and develop new features at the same time ? There is always hope that some of those rather annoying bugs that seem rather hard to fix or obscure to determine might actually get sorted out by the OOo project ;-) Look at Base for example...and I'm just guessing. Alex -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***