Le 24/02/11 16:51, Phil Hibbs a écrit :

Hi Phil,

> 
> Nonetheless, saying "it's better for us if you don't submit your
> patches to OOo" is kind of like saying "Lets hope OOo don't spot this
> bug/issue". It's ethically dubious. If this is the official approach,
> then why not just make a clean break with OOo and not even try to
> merge in any future OOo code changes with the LO code?

At a wild guess, because there are not enough devs in the LibO project
to fix all the bugs in the current OOo code and develop new features at
the same time ? There is always hope that some of those rather annoying
bugs that seem rather hard to fix or obscure to determine might actually
get sorted out by the OOo project ;-) Look at Base for example...and I'm
just guessing.

Alex


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Reply via email to