On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:35:30 +0100, yahoo-pier_andreit wrote: >Il 26/03/2011 20:09, Jonathan Hudson ha scritto: >> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:36:39 +0000 (UTC), Peter Jentsch wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm currently investigating a bug with the Excel 2003 import filter >>> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35543). Looking closer at >>> the filter and how much work needed to be done to improve it, and >>> considering the fact that Office 2003 ML has been superseeded by OOXML, >>> fixing that bug feels like flogging a dead horse. >>> >>> I'd rather suggest to drop Office 2003 support in LibO altogether and >>> instead focus on improving OOXML and HTML import/export. >>> >>> For anybody with a large library of Office 2003 XML documents not wanting >>> to upgrade to MS Office 2007/2010, Microsoft offers a compatibility pack >>> that allows to open and save OOXML from MS Office 2003. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Peter >> >> Sounds like a very reasonable proposal due to the fact that 2003 ML is >> rarely used. >> >> Your biggest problem will be the number of users who don't understand >> what ML is, and object on spurious grounds. Perhaps you should have >> just asked on the dev list. >> >> -jh >> >> >rarely??? I think is the most used in the world!!!
Please show me some URIs then (NOT .xls, but 2003 ML) -jh > >-- >Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] >Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ >*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
