Le 2011-03-28 15:29, aqualung a écrit :
Jaime R. Garza wrote:
In my opinion Must, Should, Could, Completely Irrelevant:
- *Must*: RTF
- *Must*: MS Office 97/2000/XP Binary
- *Completely Irrelevant*: MS Office 2003 XML
- *Should*: OOXML ECMA-376 / ISO/IEC 29500 Transitional
- *Must*: OOXML ISO/IEC 29500 Strict
Cheers!
Jaime
Which one of the above is the .docx file extension produced by MS Office
2007 and 2010? That one is the most important of all IMHO.
I also agree that Ms Office 2010 format is coming more and more common
and should be a *MUST*.
On the other hand, RTF seems so bastard that basic support is probably ok.
--
Michel Gagnon – [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Montréal (Québec, Canada) – mgagnon.net <http://mgagnon.net>
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
