Sorry if you feel that way. I stand by my PoV that what happened is, in some ways, a victory, even if not the one that TDF ideally would have wanted. I understand that, and not trying to minimize that at all. On Jun 5, 2011, at 5:40 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> "but a victory is a victory. Enjoy the rare one rather than > look for next one ;) " > > a 'victory' ? going from a copy-left license to source-sinkhole license ? > are you sure you are posting that on the right ML, or you just enjoy rubbing > it in ? > Yeah it is a victory for IBM, no doubt... and a nice departure middle finger > from Oracle... > Thanks Apache for lending a helpful hand... they could not have done it > without you... > Pardon me if I don't rejoice. > > Norbert > > -- > View this message in context: > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Proposal-to-join-Apache-OpenOffice-tp3022088p3025719.html > Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
