On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Ian Lynch <ianrly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 June 2011 06:55, Keith Curtis <keit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all; > > > > I had an idea that you could offer to let people triple-license their > > changes. > > > How does that work? Surely if they licensed their work Apache it means > there > is no need for the other licenses because the Apache license would > effectively over-ride the conditions of the other license. Maybe I'm > missing > something here? > > It is true that the only license that matters is the least restrictive one, but people usually add licenses and so I was following that method. If you decide to throw the others away as pointless if Apache is chosen for a change, that would be an optimization. -Keith -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
