Am 14.06.2011 09:49, schrieb Ian Lynch: > On 14 June 2011 06:55, Keith Curtis <keit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all; >> >> I had an idea that you could offer to let people triple-license their >> changes. > > > How does that work? Surely if they licensed their work Apache it means there > is no need for the other licenses because the Apache license would > effectively over-ride the conditions of the other license. Maybe I'm missing > something here?
No, it just would mean that some user of the code decides under what license he takes it. Same is true now for the dual-licensed parts (LGPL/MPL) > > LibreOffice can become an upstream of Apache with this change. That >> way people not interested in setting up build servers, etc. can work here >> while Apache setup the infrastructure. Given the state of the code dump, >> many people will not be able to contribute today, and this lets them. >> >> I think this would be a nice invitation to the Apache community. >> >> What do you think? >> >> -Keith >> >> -- >> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org >> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >> List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ >> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be >> deleted >> > > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
