-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 14/06/2011 15:31, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> How exactly would that work. So far the discussion was about moving code
> around, but what about generating code for both?
As a practical matter, the code would have to modified to work as
expected with at least one, if not both projects.
How much modification would be required, depends upon what the code
does, and how deeply into other code it interacts.
By way of example.
You could dump the entire SQLite code into LibO, or Apache_OOo, with no
modifications, if nothing called that code. However, for end users,
that SQLite code would be useless, because there would be no way for
them to create, edit, or retrieve data from an SQLite database.
If code for the UI is included, so that end users can create, edit, or
modify SQLite databases, then the code (SQLite + UI code dump) may have
to be massaged to fit project guidelines, fix bugs, or other things.
jonathon
- --
If Bing copied Google, there wouldn't be anything new worth requesting.
If Bing did not copy Google, there wouldn't be anything relevant worth
requesting.
DaveJakeman 20110207 Groklaw.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN95bgAAoJEERA7YuLpVrV/dsIAJs6sdm+5OdWVwZP91obP16Z
HHSeThNjRrIMayGPQCA04HFlG2GwuSXl5MDISAa4zC8gwmJaACt0qDHCVNWNRZ5x
yIxJiaz+ODqdLHUuw3aOpaTjMumgd86LoJRkMGx/mqZUTgd4XqR+287M02EoozPl
C9WhU8k43UI5ppOcHDA46pcJTq9L6IGWkOqN+k8yORlyCN+Q9IMLCDA2DWbzzmKb
D4ptT39IUWS0OySkeU2Y2HmBfqK4eRl1hX2seXwn6azF7PqPtbn7Ot9o3wtbu11n
tPlTYjvSgb/no2kSZS3WaGcT5hwWsfjxroDT56QB/qEaPcW2Og/ZSvMoAzRwkYo=
=Ietw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
