On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Sigrid Carrera <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:37:15 -0400 > Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 14:04, Simon Phipps <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 14 Jun 2011, at 18:27, Greg Stein wrote: >> >> For a larger body of work, these kinds of (non-CLA) contributions >> >> become less clear. And without clear provenance, then Apache may not >> >> be able to take it.[1] > > can someone enlighten me please? What is ICLA or a non-CLA? > I have no idea and would like to know, what you're talking about.
Here is the ASF's ICLA: http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt Note: this is *not* a copyright assignment. People who contribute code, documentation, or other changes to the ASF retain full copyright of their work. All this ICLA does is establish clearly that the contributor grants to the ASF has all necessary rights (within their ability to do so) to distribute this Work. > Thanks, > Sigrid - Sam Ruby -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
