On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Sveinn í Felli <svei...@nett.is> wrote: > Þann þri 21.jún 2011 11:18, skrifaði Simos Xenitellis: >> >> 2011/6/21 Jesús Corrius<je...@softcatala.org>: >>>> >>>> 1. We want to add a paragraph somewhere in the About dialog box which >>>> says that if we are interested in the source code, we should read a >>>> specific Wiki page, >>>> for example >>>> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/AvailabilityOfSourceCode >>> >>> I see a problem here. Usually GNU/Linux distributions make >>> modifications to the original source code. That means that the *real* >>> source code will be the one from your distro and not the one you can >>> download from the LibO website, hence the information will be >>> misleading. >>> >> >> As far as I know, the distributions make minimal or no changes >> to the actually code of LibreOffice. The best they will do is add >> packaging instructions. >> If you have information of a distribution that performs extensive >> LibreOffice development >> and did not bother to contribute them upstream, then please tell us >> who they are. > > At least OpenSuse does more than that; they've been doing extensive > 'branding' of both OOo and LO for quite some time. > > Example: > <http://software.opensuse.org/search/download?base=openSUSE%3A11.4&file=openSUSE%3A%2FTumbleweed%3A%2FTesting%2FopenSUSE_Tumbleweed_standard%2Fnoarch%2Flibreoffice-branding-openSUSE-3.3.1-1.1.noarch.rpm&query=libreoffice-branding> >
I opened the file (file-roller can open .rpm files) and I only saw some OpenSUSE branding icons and a small rc file. There was no code in there, and the file is a 'noarch' one (No Architecture). Perhaps you are referring to a different file? Simos -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
