Jesper Lund Stocholm wrote: > > But we are not talking about document archiving here, are we? We are > talking about round-tripping documents. > > <snip> > > But this *is* for fidelity reasons - just not meant for archiving. If > I send my team (e.g. in India) a document created in Impress or > Writer, I want the document to be opened in more or less exact the > same form it was sent. This has nothing to do about being able to open > the document 20 years from now or about legal requirements for > archiving (in Denmark, TIFF and JPEG are only allowed formats). This > has to do with sending documents around *now* and to enable any > recipient to have all information readily available for displaying the > document in the form I created it in. >
Thank you for contributing here Jesper. I think that TDF members are failing to see that LibreOffice documents are expected to be editable. And that suggesting that users should use PDF for a presentation is absurd (I won't even get into the Draw domain where this is even more important). It doesn't make ANY sense to create a presentation in an application that allows dynamic transitions, animations, videos, interactive slides and then save the output as a static PDF... If ODF is the file format for LibreOffice then it must support all requirements for all the LibreOffice applications. We are not talking about the word processor only (Writer) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RE-tdf-discuss-Re-Font-Embedding-in-ODF-was-RE-ANN-ODF-1-2-Candidate-OASIS-Standard-Enters-60-Day-Pu-tp3110117p3113926.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
