Hi Am 12.07.11 20:38, schrieb drew: > hmmm - that is assuming that the two separate projects will maintain > enough common code base that shared extensions are possible - that is a > requirement that I for one would not want to see enforced. The fact that > we can share extensions today is, IMO, a remnant of a past history and > should not dictate decisions for going forward - so I would not be in > favor our hosting Apache OpenOffice.org branded extensions on a > TDF/LibreOffice service, nor would I be in favor or seeing > TDF/Libreoffice continue to point back to Apache OpenOffice.org for any > future end user services.
As in past some extensions required some special version of OOo, in future they may require a special version of LO or only LO or only AOOo at all. It's more testing but surely can be documented and handeled. Besides that I dont't expect LO to refurbish the API on a down-to-the-foundation level in the next years. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Uwe Altmann -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
