Thorsten Behrens wrote > terribly sorry if we ever gave that impression. Admittedly, the > entry on http://www.documentfoundation.org/contribution/ was worded > like that ("Public discussions of the Board of Directors"), but I'm > rather certain it should read "List for focused interaction of the > public with the Board of Directors" instead. Page changed > accordingly, board-discuss in Cc: in case there's disagreement. ;)
I'm not sure that is the idea. Otherwise you would not get the following message when you try to post to that list on Nabble " Authorized Users Only Only authorized users can proceed in this area. You can use the form below to send a request to the administrators. Access Request Explain to the administrator(s) why you want to access this restricted area. " I particularly like the part "Explain why" So I guess it was not meant for "interaction of the public". Maybe "interaction of the members" at best... Regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-Rules-of-Procedure-approved-for-TDF-board-of-directors-tp4010079p4010349.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted