Italo, you are a firm defender of LibreOffice but sometimes your hate for AOO and Rob Weir blind you and then you loose any argument.
italovignoli wrote > Do you really believe that a Mongolian who was used to use OOo in > Mongolian is happy to use AOO in English? This is just an example, but > the concept is exactly the same for another 80 languages, which might be > minor for someone speaking only English but are not minor for the people > speaking that language. No one mentioned updates. The statistics are for downloads per country. And yes, there are for sure many Mongolians that speak and read English and are happy to use a software in English. I am Portuguese but I prefer to use the software in English. Assuming that people can only use a software if it is available in their native language is both absurd and paternalist. In any case I agree with a previous argument > Instead of advertising the value of Free Software to the public (and > LibreOffice is Free Software as AOO also is), you only think in a > LibreOffice versus AOO pattern. As a Director of the Document Foundation it would be much more interesting if you provided similar information ABOUT LibreOffice instead of AGAINST AOO... -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-did-AOO-figure-it-was-worth-21-Million-dollars-a-day-or-7-billion-per-year-tp4038695p4038884.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
