Hi Stuart
V Stuart Foote wrote > Install directory to be adjusted to "LibreOffice 4", rather than dropping > numbered versioning completely as proposed. > > Also won't adopt for 4.0.3, so soonest implementation will be at 4.1.0 RC1 Thank you for the update. I don't see any logic in this half-way solution. Instead of fixing this permanently (by simply removing the number), the ESC postponed this into 2015 (or whenever version 5.0 is released) Why insist on the Linux model under Windows? Mozilla Firefox changes major version about every month. Do they have a version named folder? Answering Andras question "are there really migration problems?" If the question is: are there study cases where this has been demonstrated to be an obstacle? Then the answer is "No. But unfortunately, there aren't that many study case reports" Yet, there are problems: you need to reinstall All User extensions for every version change. If keeping extensions is acceptable for User extensions (which potentially are installed by less knowledgeable users than the system admin) why not use the same logic for extensions that affect all users in a machine? Please consider these facts. Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Install-path-for-LibreOffice-under-Windows-tp4041530p4043912.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
