<quote who="Mike Linksvayer" date="Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 06:13:54AM +0000"> > It seems that as we churned through ideas for "remix" and "share" icons > the provenance of those ideas got temporarily lost. Sorry about that! > (Yes, I feel the irony.)
Thanks for the quick reply and for the explanation. > It doesn't seem like there's a consensus on the matter, so discuss, or > let me know if I missed the boat. I think the most interesting idea floated was the idea to find another logo for FC. This is good a idea not because CC has started using the logo, as Fred suggests, but because the use points out the way that the current FC logo only really reflects a small part of what FC does and represents. In any case, Larry is absolutely right. We, of all people, shouldn't have this discussion in terms of trademarks and ownership of the image. I tried to frame the discussion so that it wouldn't be had in those terms. The last day has given us an opportunity to think about the FC logo and what it means (and doesn't mean) in a way that many of us never had. I think that's a great opportunity and one we shouldn't pass up. Thanks Mike and Larry for the quick and very helpful responses from CC! Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mako.cc/ Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results. --RMS _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
