"Fred Benenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Unfortunately we're only soliciting comments on the talk page on the > wiki -- if you are not comfortable using that process then I'm afraid you > can't participate.
That's more than unfortunate: it's absolutely incredible. If that holds, then I don't think FC.o wants feedback. Should people be comfortable signing up on a US-based wiki with a blank privacy policy? I'm certainly not. There's no telling who owns the wiki and what they're going to do with the data submitted. What is the point of a list called discuss.freeculture.org if discussion is not welcome here? Wikis are pretty bad locations for discussion and MediaWikis are even worse. Email is the way to go - learn from the work of e-democracy.org and others. Why is feedback on the charter any less valid if sent by email? Must all FC.o supporters have always-on web access? Why is it so difficult for one of the wiki admins or the starter of this thread to simply link this thread in the archives? Absolutely amazed, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Experienced webmaster-developers for hire http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ Also: statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, workers co-op. Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
