BBC TV report on the Oink arrest:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=QuwwMZKYxag

Suspicious claims in this report:

* "illegal downloading ... media organizations ... billions in lost revenue"

* "suspect has made hundreds of thousands of pounds"

* "180,000 members who pay a subscription"

* "music available on that website is pre-release, hasn't got into record shops"

BONUS * footage of napster and winamp 2.666 with "slim shady" playing
in the background!

Enjoy,
Kevin




On 10/23/07, Fred Benenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks to be one of those "arrest now and ask questions later" kind of
> tactics that were used against DVD Jon and The Pirate Bay.
>
> They do this against cyclists in NYC to break up the Critical Mass rides --
> people get thrown into jail as a punishment rather than a act of the legal
> process and by the time their case gets to court, 99.9% of the time, the
> judge dismisses it.
>
> Anyway, it will be strange to see how the Trademark argument against TV
> Links is pursued, but I think Asheesh is on to something....
>
>
> IANAL,
>
> F
>
>
>
> On 10/23/07, Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Kevin Driscoll wrote:
> >
> > > Yes!  It's absolutely critical to examine this distinction (if indeed,
> > > there is a distinction to be found.)
> > >
> > > Stranger still, if you take the Register's account, the TV-Links
> > > arrest is based on trademark law!
> > >
> > >
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/23/tv_links_trademark_law/
> >
> > I am not a laywer, nor do I impersonate them on mailing lists, but
> > wouldn't it only be a trademark violation if they using the
> > trademarked name of a TV show to link to video file that was *not* the
> > TV show in question?  That is to say, if the abuser of the mark were
> > misleading consumers using the mark?
> >
> > I eagerly await corrections, slap-downs, and shocked stares from those on
> > this list who actually know law.
> >
> > -- Asheesh.
> >
> > --
> > Usage: fortune -P [] -a [xsz] [Q: [file]] [rKe9] -v6[+] dataspec ...
> inputdir
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to