There are a lot of public interest organizations that are using All Rights Reserved when they really want their message to get out to as many people as possible. I think that engaging non-profits and educating them about the advantages of using CC would be a good idea for SFFC.
I am running a panel on nonprofit copyright in New Orleans this coming March for NTEN's Nonprofit Technology Conference. I may be looking for additional speakers. Brian Rowe 2L Seattle University On Nov 14, 2007 1:27 PM, Elizabeth Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "(c) ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 1000" > > First, we need to get the ACLU to start using CC licenses. Second, we > need to get documentarians and public TV to use them as well, so that > more people can have access to the work they create and broadcast. > > Then this might be actually be related to FC. ;) > > On 11/14/07, William Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Under this sort of reasoning almost any educational or First Amendment > issue > > could be grouped under the Free Culture category. I can't imagine it > would > > be useful to have such a broad mission for this organization. The NOVA > > special was very interesting, though. > > > > > > On Nov 12, 2007 7:25 PM, Peter Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > At 7:48 PM -0500 11/12/07, Fred Benenson wrote: > > > >Hi, I know this seems like something most people on this list might > > > >be interested in, but it's really not on topic with respect to Free > > > >Culture, so it's really not appropriate for this list. > > > > > > > >Hope you understand & Thanks! > > > > > > > >Fred > > > > > > I understand that it's borderline, and has an argument against it that > it > > > could start an argument about the merits of ID, which definitely would > be > > > off-topic. > > > > > > But consider the situation in which you live in a theocracy where > > religious > > > tenets are deployed routinely to interfere with science. Such > theocracies > > > exist, but the United States is not one of them. Nevertheless, for > > someone > > > in that situation interference with science in this fashion is as much > a > > free > > > culture issue as open access to knowledge. > > > > > > (I will now step off my soapbox :-) > > > > > > peter > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Discuss mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- Brian Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] (206) 335-8577 (Cell) Access To Justice Technology Principles www.ATJWeb.org Freedom for IP www.FreedomforIP.org
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
