sorry, *is* playing a role

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Elizabeth Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I've been saying for a long time that there's a need for something like
> this, and this sounds like an excellent start!
>
> One thing that I'd add that's already implicit in various parts of the
> proposal in playing a role in advocating on particular issues--advocacy
> should definitely be a key part of such an org.
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Brian Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> What would you like to see as your ideal grassroots, general public,
>> international FC org?
>>
>> I think the members should help form the orgs platform.  I would strive to
>> be inclusive instead of exclusive.  Here are my initial thoughts
>>
>> Platform:
>> 1. Open Access to all knowledge (regardless of of ones social or economic
>> standing) especially to scholarly works
>> 2. Participatory Culture - broader rights to remix and reuse culture.
>> focus on minimizing transactional costs and Fair Use
>> 3. Innovation through access to cultural and scientific works
>> 4. Inclusive of Artist, Coders, Students, Academics, and General members
>> of the population
>> 5. Focus on expanding the Public Domain, Fair Use and Free Speech
>> 6. Recognition of broader social goals Free Culture contributes to
>> including but not limited to: equality, access to justice, access to
>> essential medicines and basic Human Rights
>>
>> Major Activities:
>> 1. Alliance building - willing to work with other orgs to coordinate
>> campaigns
>> 2. Political activism -  campaigns where members can take action
>> 3. Act as an umbrella organization that would help foster smaller projects
>> and provide assistance to fledgling FC related ideas
>> 4. Outreach and education at middle schools, high schools, colleges,
>> technology summits, conferences professional and academic
>> 5. Direct media contact over current issues
>>
>> Policies:
>> 1. Strongly recommend PD, BY or freedom defined licenses
>> 2. the organization exclusively uses PD or BY for all publications
>> 3. Strongly recommend Free Open Source Software on all platforms with a
>> preference for Linux (or other open OS)
>> 4. The organization should set an example in its own software choices
>> 5. Promotion of data portability for Web applications
>> 6. Promotion of open standards
>>
>> Governance:
>> 1.  NPO 501c3 or charitable org
>> 2.  Member driven (funded at least in part through memberships)
>> 3.  Board of directors which includes input from general members. Maybe 1
>> or 2 elected or appointed position on the board that represent member
>> perspectives.
>> 4.  Membership level of "Volunteer" where one can donate time instead of
>> cash to become a member
>> 5.  Open investments - the community should be assured that all org
>> investments are in places that are compatible with the mission
>> 6.  Publicly Open Board meetings for all matters except emergencies and
>> personal decisions.
>>
>> Ideas to help start:
>> Challenge pledge the way Open Rights Group (ORG) was founded
>> Merging a few existing fledgling orgs under central leadership
>>
>> Things to avoid:
>> 1. Direct Litigation - EFF and ACLU are doing well here and the cost is
>> very high.  I would limit legal action to policy papers and *amici briefs
>> *
>> 2. PAC Money - We can't change the system through buying representatives.
>>
>> General comments:
>> This outline is heavily influenced by my work on Freedom for IP and WSBA's
>> Access to Justice Committee.  Please feel free to make any comments,
>> suggestions or critisims.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Brian Rowe
>> Seattle University Law
>> --
>> Brian Rowe
>> 3L Seattle University
>> (206) 335-8577 (Cell)
>>
>> Access To Justice Technology Principles
>> www.ATJWeb.org
>>
>> Freedom for IP
>> www.FreedomforIP.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to