On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Adi Kamdar <[email protected]> wrote:
> And the creative commons SA clauses clearly say that any adaptation (which > includes a derivative work... which includes any work that expands upon a > work but is largely original) must be licensed under this scheme. > Um. > -Adi Must be licensed under that scheme... or else it's not following the license terms, and therefore it's a copyright violation. Since the work was not so licensed, that means its either fair use or a violation of the Wikipedians' copyright. The CC licenses make clear that violating the terms of the license means that the violator no longer has the right to use the work under the license. It doesn't say or imply anything about involuntary licensing of derivative works. -Sage _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
