Yes. The definition in 17 U.S.C. 101 uses the disjunctive. Thus, if the place is open to the public, the number of attendees is irrelevant.

    --Christian

On 2/10/2012 2:37 PM, Thomas Levine wrote:
Hmm... if a video plays in a national park and no one is around to watch it, is it being performed publically?

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Karl Fogel <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Adi Kamdar <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> writes:
    >Yeah, context is key---there aren't any hard lines or numbers. There
    >also seems to be some deference to the nature of the performance---if
    >it's commercial, if it's in an educational context, etc.
    >
    >for example:
    >
    >http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/110.html

    Remember: if you don't have to ask a lawyer, then the law isn't doing
    its job :-).

    -K

    >On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Rob Myers <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >
    >    On 10/02/12 19:20, andrea fassina wrote:
    > >
    > > maybe someone knows the answer, but how many viewers need to be
    >    in a
    > > room before the show is considered a public performance?
    >
    >
    > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performing_rights
    >
    >    "Performances are considered "public" if they take place in a
    >    public
    >    place and the audience is outside of a normal circle of friends
    >    and
    >    family, including concerts, nightclubs, restaurants etc. Public
    >    performance also includes broadcast and cable television, radio,
    >    and any
    >    other transmitted performance of a live song."
    >
    >    So I think its more context than number, and so I'd guess one
    *if*
    >    it's
    >    not your friend or family and it's not your apartment. But maybe
    >    there's
    >    some useful case law on the subject.
    >
    >    - Rob.
    >
    >
    >    _______________________________________________
    >    Discuss mailing list
    > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
    >    FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
    >
    >
    >_______________________________________________
    >Discuss mailing list
    >[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    >http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
    >FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
    _______________________________________________
    Discuss mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
    FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss




_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss

Reply via email to