Chris, Thanks for sharing. I think you're doing a pretty good job showing that you're sharing links to both "sharable/non-libre" and also some even freer content on the site. For example, the top of the Music page shows: "This page shows all common content <http://fossilbank.wikidot.com/common-content>music. For a list that only contains free, libre and open works, see Music (Libre) <http://fossilbank.wikidot.com/category:music-libre>"
I'm linking to your site from my defunct/proto-libre music blog<http://libremusic.posterous.com>on posterous. Thanks again. -Nate http://ottonomy.net | @ottonomy <https://twitter.com/ottonomy> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Ben Finney < [email protected]> wrote: > Chris Sakkas <[email protected]> writes: > > > Hey Karl, > > > > That's a fair comment - especially since 'open source' is often used > > exclusively to refer to software. I've changed to 'Shareable and Libre', > > which is as you say consistent with the rest of the site. > > No, works are not “Libre” when restricted by CC's NC or ND clauses. You > can say they're shareable, but please don't contribute to the false > impression of freedom some people have about those restrictive clauses. > > Thanks for maintaining the site. > > -- > \ “Be careless in your dress if you must, but keep a tidy soul.” | > `\ —Mark Twain, _Following the Equator_ | > _o__) | > Ben Finney > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
